Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Who's behind the terror attacks around the world?


11 September 2003: New York, the WTC complex buildings 1, 2, and 7 along with Westfield Hotel were ruined in the 9/11 attacks, and consequently about $5.4 billion went into the pockets of Lowy and Silverstein. 

21 September 2005: Westfield Mall in Perth, Australia, bomb threat. 

17 May 2006: Westfield in Woden, Australia, bomb threat. 

21 July 2007: Court house adjacent Westfield Centre Derby, England, bomb threat, which caused evacuation of Westfield premises. 

01 March 2008: Westfield Old Orchard Mall, Skokie, Illinois, bomb threat. 

20 April 2009: Westfield Hotel Annapolis, bomb threat. 

20 September 2008: Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan, bombing. 

17 July 2008: Marriott Hotel in Jakarta, Indonesia, bombing.


FRANK LOWY, the Israeli Australian citizen ... WHO IS HE???




Would the 2012 London Olympic Games experience another 9/11? How could a mock terrorist attacks fill pockets of British Zionist lobby ? What do you know about Australia’s richest man and influenced bussiness man in London ?


Frank Lowy is one of the Zionist capitalists, who you may have heard less about. He tends not to be raised in the press and media in order to pursue his own commercial and political affairs comfortably. 

Frank Lowy is the wealthiest person in Australia; his business provides income in dozens of cities and several of the world’s countries; He is among the founders and mangers of influential Israeli and American think tanks; He has paid enormous amounts of money to influence large governments’ foreign policies towards the Middle East, especially in the Israeli-Arab conflict; finally he is one of the Zionists who received heavy compensation from insurance companies after the 9/11 attacks.


Lowy was born on October 22, 1930, in Czechoslovakia, and lived in Budapest, Hungary during the World War II. After the end of the war, he went to France in 1946 so as to make his way to British Mandate of Palestine, but he was caught en route by the British and deported to a detention camp in Cyprus. However, after several months, Lowy was allowed into Palestine. 

Lowy fought in Israel’s war of independence as a member of the terrorist organization Haganah. Then he joined the Israeli regime’s Golani Brigade, which was formed in February 1984. 

Lowy, who is also one of the Holocaust advocates, introduces himself as one of the survivors of the Nazi death camps. In 1991, he provided the cost of rebuilding the wagon that transferred Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz and put the vehicle on the ground of the concentration camp. 


In 1952, Lowy left Israel and joined his family, who had left Europe for Australia. One year later in 1953, he met a Hungarian called John Saunders. They jointly created the Westfield Development Corporation through the development of a shopping centre at Blacktown in Sydney's western suburbs. 

Over the next 30 years, these the two developed a number of shopping centers across Australia and the US (from 1977). They changed the name of the company to the Westfield Group and listed the firm on the Australian Stock Exchange in 1960. Saunders sold his interests in 1987 and at the same time Lowy developed the company to New Zealand (in the 1990s) and the UK (in the 2000s). 


Lowy has appeared on the Business Review Weekly (BRW) Rich 200 list every year since it was first published in 1983. In 2010, the magazine measured Lowy's wealth at $5 billion and introduced him as Australia's richest person at that time. He also took part in investment and banking in London, New York and Los Angeles. 

After turning 80 in October 2010, Lowy officially stood down as Executive Chairman of the Westfield Group and took on the role of the General President. Since then, his two Sons, Steven and Peter, became joint Chief Executives of the company. Peter Lowy, who is a member of the board of directors of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, was formerly Chairman of the board of trustees at the University of Judaism, which is now known as the American Jewish University. 

Lowy’s enthusiasm for banking was not limited only to the US. He is one of the members of the board of directors of the Reserve Bank of Australia, which is the same Australia’s Central Bank. Lowy also served for 10 years as President of the Reserve Bank of Australia. 

In 2003, Lowy was appointed as Chairman of the Football Federation Australia (FFA). Four years later in 2007, Australia nominated for hosting the 2022 FIFA World CUP, but eventually Qatar was awarded the right to host the sports event. In September 2008, it was announced that Lowy was elected as a member of the FIFA board. 

* Lowy’s huge profits after 9/11 attacks* 

Frank Lowy and his copartner Larry Silverstein had rented the whole World Trade Center (WTC) for 99 years just a few weeks before the 9/11 attacks. The deal was done by Lewis Eisenberg, former Chairman of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Prior to the 9/11 attacks, Eisenberg was elected as Chairman of the Republican Leadership Council. Furthermore, in 1980s, Eisenberg resigned from the controversial Goldman Sachs Bank, after his secretary accused him of sexual abuse. 

In 1987, Silverstein constructed the World Trade Center 7 on the ground, which he had rented from the Port’s board of trustees, but the building number 6 of the WTC complex remained under the government’s control until when Silverstein and Lowy signed a ninety-nine-year lease with the board of trustees on July 26, 2001. According to the new contract, Silverstein took the control of 6.10 million square feet of the WTC’s office space. Moreover, Lowy became responsible for 427,000 million square feet of the complex’s entertainment and sales space in the basement floor.

The WTC complex buildings 1, 2, and 7 along with Westfield Hotel were ruined in the 9/11 attacks, so Silverstein and the Westfield company pocketed about $5.4 billion from the attacks. 



On April 14, 2002, the Sunday Times revealed that Lowy had bribed one of the Tony Blair government’s officials. The newspaper reported that an Australian property group headed by one of the world's richest men had paid a £250,000 bribe to Lord Levy, one of Blair's closest and most trusted aides. 

These payments, which the company tried to make them secretly, were started from 1999, when Lord Levy began his work as Tony Blair's special envoy to the Middle East. These amounts were paid under the order of Frank Lowy, Chairman of the Westfield company. 

From 1999 Lowy was employed as an advisor without having any specialization in the activity by the Westfield company, and received £3,800 weekly. During his three-year mission, Lowy travelled 45 times to 19 countries and visited Israeli and Arab leaders. After Lowy came under pressure to disclose his relations with the Westfield, he broke off his cooperation with the company. 

Lord Levy is also a committed Zionist and a member of the Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), which is a parliamentary group affiliated to the British Labour Party. 




* Would the 2012 London Olympic Games experience another 9/11?* 

the Westfield company has a considerable talent for attracting terrorist attacks. 

11 September 2003: New York, the WTC complex buildings 1, 2, and 7 along with Westfield Hotel were ruined in the 9/11 attacks, and consequently about $5.4 billion went into the pockets of Lowy and Silverstein. 

21 September 2005: Westfield Mall in Perth, Australia, bomb threat. 

17 May 2006: Westfield in Woden, Australia, bomb threat. 

21 July 2007: Court house adjacent Westfield Centre Derby, England, bomb threat, which caused evacuation of Westfield premises. 

01 March 2008: Westfield Old Orchard Mall, Skokie, Illinois, bomb threat. 

20 April 2009: Westfield Hotel Annapolis, bomb threat. 

20 September 2008: Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan, bombing. 

17 July 2008: Marriott Hotel in Jakarta, Indonesia, bombing. 


In September 2011, Frank Lowy opened Westfield Stratford City Mall, which is situated near the Olympic Park. With regard to Lowy’s talent for investment in places that are victims of terrorist attacks, the question raises that whether the Olympic Park would be a possible target for terrorist attacks. The insurance companies have been committed to compensate about $7 billion for lost profits, if terrorist attacks happen. Apparently, some people and companies would earn huge profits from tragedies and sufferings of the masses. 

The insurance company Pool Re, which is led under the supervision of the British government, has provided a $7 billion insurance cover for terror threats occurring during the 2012 London Olympic Games. Steve Atkins, Pool Re Chief Executive, announced that his team has carried out close scrutiny to find out how much customers are in danger of terrorism so as to prepare itself against possible terrorist attacks. The Pool Re company has an extraordinary talent for insuring places, which later become targets of terrorist attacks. 

The biggest loss incurred by the Pool Re, was the Bishopgate bombing in London 1993, in which it was forced to pay £260 million in compensation. 

Moreover, the insurance company paid another £240 million in the 1996 Manchester bombing. It also lost tens of millions of pounds in the July 7th 2005 terrorist attacks. 


Frank Lowy is not active only in economics; he is also very interested in politics. He was appointed as Deputy Chairman of the Israel Democracy Institute in 2001 and two later in 2003, he established the Lowy Institute for International Policy. The Institute was a think tank in the field of foreign policy, which worked on foreign affairs. Lowy’s activities caused him to be awarded the Woodrow Wilson Awards for Corporate Citizenship in 2005. In the same year, the Institute transferred its central office to Sydney. The new office was opened by John Howard, the Australian Prime Minister and Lowy’s close friend. 

Lowy also founded the Israeli Institute for Policy and National Strategy, which will operate in the framework of Tel Aviv University. 

In addition, Lowy is a member of the Brookings Institution International Advisory Council in Washington, which is considered as the most influential American think tank. 

The establishment of those think tanks caused Lowy to be awarded the Woodrow Wilson Awards for Corporate Citizenship in 2005. 

However, Lowy’s interest in intervening in world affairs is not limited only to the above-mentioned ones. He is also Deputy Chairman of a right-wing monthly magazine called the Australia/Israel Review (AIR), which is a subset of the Australia Israeli Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC), Australian version of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). 

Article by Montea Cristo : Freelance Journalist 

SSM/HE 

DISCLAIMER: The authors' views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Press TV News Network.

source:-
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/254739.html


ALSO SEE : ALL THE NECESSARY PROOFS WHAT ISRAEL DID ON 9/11
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_107.htm



Thursday, July 19, 2012

Real names of Celebrities

Real names of Celebrities

 
Vin Diesel - Mark Vincent
 Real names of celebrities and their aliases — Today we learn the real names of celebrities who have come up with pseudonyms to hide from us their origin or to consonance, 30 more celebrities after the break...

Reese Witherspoon - Laura Jean Reese Witherspoon
Demi Moore - Demetria Gaynes
Tom Cruise - Tom Mapozer
Puff Daddy - Sean Combs, John
Angelina Jolie - Angelina Jolie's
Elton John - Reginald Kenneth Dwight
Snoop Dogg - Calvin Broadus Kordazer
Shenayya Tueni - Eileen Regina Edwards
Tom Jones - Thomas Woodward
Miley Cyrus - Destiny Hope Cyrus
Shakira - Shakira Isabel Mebarak
Jodie Foster - Alicia Christian Foster
Busta Rhymes - Trevor Smith
Chuck Norris - Carlos Ray
50 Cent - Curtis Jackson
Ashton Kutcher - Christopher Ashton Kutcher
Axl Rose - William Bailey
Alicia Keys - Alicia Cook Odzhello
Bob Dylan - Robert Zimmerman
Bruce Lee - Lee Yuen Kam
David Bowie - David Robert Jones
Whoopi Goldberg - Caryn Johnson
Fergie - Stacey Ferguson
Madonna - Mary Louise Ciccone
Kirk Douglas - Issur Danielovich
Marilyn Monroe - Norma Jean Baker
Woody Allen - Allen Konigsberg
George Michael - Georgios Panaionku
Winona Ryder - Winona Laura Horowitz
Danny DeVito - Daniel Michael
 

10 Commandments for being good wives

10 Commandments for being good wives

 
NOW THIS IS FOR ALL LADIES... OF HOW TO BE A GOOD WIFE FOR THEIR HUSBANDS...
 

1. Be careful when your husband is angry. At this point, do not be no fun, no grumpy - smiled and said softly.

2. Do not make your husband wait for food. Hunger - the father of anger.

3. Do not wake him when he sleeps.

4. Be careful with his money. Do not hide from him his financial affairs.

5. Keep it secret. If he brags, and keep it a secret.

6. I do not approve of his enemies and not hate his friends.

7. I do not mind him and do not claim that your advice is better than him.

8. Do not expect the impossible.

9. If you will be attentive to his request, he will be your slave.

10. Do not say anything that would hurt him. If you're going to treat him like a king, he will treat you like a queen.

Buddhist Monks kill 80,000 Muslims in Burma until date

The other, invisible suffering of Burma

 
 
 
 
 
 
Rate This

Muslims in BurmaSince the revolt of the monks against the military junta in Burma, all the western mass media have focused on the long history of oppression of this South Asian country, which, I suppose, few of us really know about. While in Italy, I saw people wearing purple T-shirts in the streets, at the universities, and organised protests at the Burmese embassies in support of the ‘Buddhist monks’. This struggle for freedom has seen recently its first victims, and there is a general fear that the new protest can be as unsuccessful as the attempted revolution in 1988. Yet the attention is very much focused upon the courage of the ‘peaceful’ monks.
From an anthropological viewpoint, the revolt in Burma is particularly interesting for an anthropologist specialised in Muslim societies and communities. There are two elements that attract my attention. First of all, how this revolt is represented by the western mass media and secondly, the near total lack of reference to the drama that the Muslim minority, the so called Rohingya Muslims, have experienced in the last three decades. There are some hard stereotypes which affect how the mass media represent religions, and consequently, how ordinary people understand religions.
To make a long story short (and of course this means to over-generalise), religions are still understood through a Manichean vision: peaceful versus violent, good versus evil, true versus false. Of course, in the majority of cases, political correctness has transformed the vehement apologetic diatribe of Middle Age origin. Today, the Manichean discourse is passed to the mass media audience through latent or manifest stereotypes, which essentialize religion into a ‘real thing’; a powerful cultural artifact from which actions derives. So, Buddhism is the most peaceful religion; Islam the aggressive and violent; Christianity the confused one.
The mass media needs to simplify, to present news in a sequence of exponential pathos, to attract your ocular bulbs and conquer your mind long enough to feed you all the appropriate advertisements (the real end of all the process). Yet religion is a complex phenomenon, and I can tell you that it is as variegate as the human beings which live on this beautiful, yet terminally ill, planet.
“Burma is a Buddhist state facing a Buddhist power struggle.” This would be the headlines of newspapers if instead of a Buddhist state with Buddhist monks, Burma was Iran, where the confrontation between Shi’i Muslims and Sunni Muslims seems to be able to explain everything, including the failure of the Iraqi American dream. Of course, the Burmese drama is more complex than just a struggle within a religion or the struggle between saints and kings.
However, the mass media, which discusses and reports the oppression of the Buddhist population by the generals, neglects to inform you about another story, another tragedy. The omission, when compared, is not very dissimilar from the western attitude towards other Muslim minority and refugee tragedies. Just to mention one, allow me to remind you of the case of Bosnia-Herzegovina, and its genocide that nobody (not even Muslims) commemorate. Muslims often play only one part in the drama of headline news, the evil character, like the Indians in the Hollywood Western films , before Sergio Leone corrected the historical mistake.
Here is a reality of Burma that probably you have never heard about (if by any chance you had heard about Burma before!). Muslims in Burma are a persecuted minority. It is a long story and history that I will try to summarize for you, and let you read more from the little available on the topic.
Burma has about 4% of Muslim population (Muslim leaders say 10%). The life of Burmese Muslims has never been easy, and as other Muslims (i.e. Palestinians) they received amazing promises from us, the British, only to find themselves abandoned to a destiny of suffering after the end of the British colonialism. So, here is the story of the Rohingya Muslims, and their grim destiny. The Rohingya Muslims live mainly in the North of the Rakhine State and represent, officially, 4% of the entire Burmese population, but represent 50% of the population of Rakhine state (previously known as Arkana) itself. Islam reached the region during the 9th century through contact with Arab merchants. Arkana was an independent state until 1784 and developed it’s own culture and also dialect. In 1784, a Burmese king, Bodawpaya, annexed Arkana to his domain. This provoked a long guerrilla war with the Muslims, which saw, according to historians, more than 200,000 Arkanese killed. Many of the local Muslim population, at that time, were reduced to slavery and forced to build Buddhist monasteries.
The struggle continued, but so unsuccessfully that in 1796 more than two-thirds of the Muslim population of Arkana had to leave the country and find refuge in what today is Bangladesh. Arkana was annexed to the rest of the British Empire by 1885, and many Rohingya Muslims decided to go back to their homeland. The journey between their homeland and Bangladesh would become a cruel ritual for this population. Until the Second World War, Muslims and Buddhists were able to live more or less peacefully side by side. Yet the Japanese were reaching the region in 1942, and so again the Muslims, and this time also the British, were forced to leave Arkana .The Buddhists found an opportunity to clear the Muslim population from Arkana, and thus another 20,000 Muslims had to reach the British Indian territories (again today Bangladesh). Indeed, while the Rakhine Buddhists supported the Japanese, the Muslims, as in other countries, supported the British forces. The British, to thank the Muslims for their support and loyalty, promised the Rohingyas an autonomous region in the north of the country. Many refugees decided to come back to their homes, full of hope for the possibility of having their own state. As usual in British foreign relationships and history, the promise was never honoured. Also the fact that the Muslim population had supported the British and tried to achieve autonomy in the northern region, made them appear suspicious to the Burmese regime and the main Buddhist population. These feelings toward the Muslim minority not only still exist today but also have been reinforced, after the Taliban destroyed the Buddhas of Bayan.
Muslims in Burma are not considered to be citizens. They have no rights and often suffer discrimination and indiscriminate killings. Many of them, in particular after 1962, had to flee the country and still today live in refugee camps in Bangladesh, which actually do not welcome them. Although Muslims have taken active part in the 1988 revolt, and paid the consequences more than the Buddhist population, the majority of monks and Buddhists in Burma have anti-Muslim sentiments, in particular based on the fear of possible intermarriages.
Pamphlets glorifying race purity and Buddhism and actually reinforcing anti-Muslim sentiments have been distributed since 2001 (i.e. Myo Pyauk Hmar Soe Kyauk Hla Tai or The Fear of Losing One’s Race). These inflammatory publications, preaching against the Muslim minority, as well as rumors spread about Muslims raping children in the streets, provoked a series of monk-led riots against Muslim families and the destruction of mosques. Muslims were killed and mosques destroyed, and again the Rohingya Muslims had to flee to Bangladesh.
Today we are witnessing a new Burmese revolt, organised mainly by the few politicised monks. Everybody hopes that the Buddhist monks can succeed in mobilising the population in a sort of Intifada. Some Muslims, I know, are repeating their Inshallahs in the not so distant Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh. They hope that the end of the military junta means the end of their oppression.
Nonetheless, a question remains, after such strong monk-led anti-Muslim campaigns which were also reinforced by the welcomed ‘Bushit’ rhetoric of ‘war on terror’: would the new, certainly Buddhist, regime accept the history and the existence, as Burmese citizens, of Rohingya Muslims? Or, would the new regime, like their predecessor generals the Muslims as an easy scapegoat?
Gabriele

Unless the Muslims have played a pivotal role in the latest regime change, I doubt their situation will change much. I know very little about Burma/Myanmar (I know they had a road we were really worked up about 65 years ago, and the Flying Tigers were stationed there. Oh, and they have a Nobel prize-winner under perpetual house arrest). But this all sounds depressingly familiar. No power means no influence, and no influence means you’re last on the list of political priorities.
Thanks to the isolation the last regime arranged for Burma, there won’t be a whole lot of attention paid regardless. Hopefully, folks like you can at least keep the spotlight on.


http://marranci.wordpress.com/2007/09/30/the-other-invisible-suffering-of-burma/
 

Friday, March 23, 2012

Kolaveri English Version